- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Forrest
Should I take a 100k low stress remote job in a low cost of living area or a 150k medium stress in person job in a high cost of living area?
I’m at a crossroads in my career and need advice. I’ve been offered two job opportunities: one is a remote position with a salary of $100k and a low-stress environment, while the other is an in-person role that pays $150k but comes with a moderate level of stress.
I value work-life balance and flexibility, but the higher salary is also tempting. I’m looking for perspectives from others who have faced similar choices.
Which option would you recommend, and what factors should I consider before making my decision?
Wesley100k remote all day long. Trust me. That’s a no brainer. Remote and low stress in a low cost area? All day long. No question.
ChlorisIf something might cost your mental health or wellbeing, I would say, run away from it. Your health is more important.
ErinIf remote status is revoked would you be able to secure a similar position?
TrinhRemote job is being replaced by Indian from far far land shortly for the same position. Watch out!
Take $150K and use that as the negotiation power for the next move.
StefWhich advances your career more? I would probably opt for the remote job.
If you’re trying to make bank, once you’re comfortable with that job add a second or short term contract and try overemployment.
Michelle100k one. You can enjoy life and have a balance or take on another job or hobby. 150k is not 50k more a year after taxes, and what you’ll have after you pay for your HCOL expenses.
You’ll probably take home/save less than you would at a 150k a year vs.
at 100k a year, which won’t help you reach FIRE sooner.
AngelaLower cuz the higher pay will get eaten by the cost of living and stress
DianeGosh, I would the 150k sounds good especially if in a better area. But I guess it depends on what you want to deal with at the end of the day.
AvaWhat’s the cost of stress on your health? 100k easy.
Unless you would enjoy the 150k one more.TaraRemote low stress for me!l as a parent of elementary age kids, maybe different at a different life stage
KatieWorking remote would save you gas money and lunch money. It will also give you time since you don’t have to drive to and from the office.
I’d also compare benefits and see how health insurance, 401k etc compare for each job.I personally would get bored being remote but would enjoy hybrid if that’s an option!
Good luck whichever direction you go!
Markthe 100k is probably more than the 150, as the time saved, driving, gas costs..yes take the at home everyday and twice on sunday!
SantanaYou mentioned your kids…. Does the remote job mean you will see your kids more?
PatrickDepends where you are on your journey to fire… early? hustle hard. If the red fire carpet is rolling out for you (aka you’ve accumulated some and compounding and basic healthy personal finance should do the rest), then think of settling down some for the perks of better lifestyle
Aliha100k low stress, remote, low cost of living.
It’s a triple win!Shane100k low cost is a better investment all around. the HCOL will add up, as will the stress.
Remote is freedom, if you can work one remote job, you can likely work 2 or 4
-
AuthorPosts
Related Topics:
- Senior level job with lot of responsibilities vs Low-stress job
- How should rent be fairly split between partners with different salaries and job commitments?
- How do I find a recruiter in the Philadelphia/Delaware area to re-enter management?
- What major should I study for a remote job paying $80k-$100k in 3-5 years?
- I work in tech and have been having a hard time increasing my salary
- Can my husband retire early at 46 despite $800K in college costs?
No related posts.